Well, I see only 2 attack path for us. Ssh interface and the macro/scripting interface.
SSH or web we need to update libs, so wee need a flexible way to reference both. Scripting I don't know, not my area of expertise. Anyone with insights? Please note I start splitting because we get more and more OT. Am 21. Mai 2017 17:10:16 MESZ schrieb Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net>: > > >Sent from my iPhone > >> On May 21, 2017, at 10:34 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> >wrote: >> >> >>> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] >> >>> Here are some of mine. I am sure others differ. >>> >>> (1) investigate and fix security holes. >> >> +1 >> >>> (2) frequent releases. >> >> +-0 or -1 >> >> In practice, a time interval of 12-15 months would be sufficient. > >More frequent releases are needed for two reasons. > >- security fixes >- making sure we have several people who can be release manager. > >Feature releases can be on an interval you describe. > >> >> Note: the release cycle of LO is much too short, even if this is >always presented as an advantage. >> I could write "imho", but the truth is that the one is a tangible >practice problem for professional office users. Because I offer >commercial support for OO and LO, I know what I'm talking about. >> >>> (3) near one to one conversion to and from Microsoft Office. >> >> +-0 >> >> Do you know the story of the hare and the hedgehog? >http://www.pitt.edu/~dash/grimm187.html >> >> >> Yes, the users want that, but would not it be right and honest to >tell the users: >> 'if you want MS Office, then use MS Office and not OO' > >Users want to convert to AOO but cannot easily. Users want to share >with friends on MSFT. Having a great divide is not tenable. Perhaps >this is an extension. > >> >>> (4) deconflicted feature requests. >> >> I do not know what you mean specifically with "deconflicted". > >Raphael mentioned that feature requests bite each other. In >prioritizing these we should pick which way. >> >> >>> What do people think? >> >> I think _in the present situation_ it is better to work more and to >discuss less. > >Agreed, but I'd still like to know what others think. > >> >> I am unfortunately not a programmer of OO, but I support the project >with user support, as a member of the project www.prooo-box.org and as >a moderator in the forum http://openoffice.org. >> I have regularly supported the project through translations of the >release notes into the German language. > >Thank you. > >Regards, >Dave >> >> >> >> greetings, >> Jörg >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> > > >--------------------------------------------------------------------- >To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
