Waiting for an apology that's never going to come is not going to help. Meh had some misstatements of fact, but the description of other projects was interesting. I don't care to correct the misstatements.
We have work to do here. Onward! Regards, Dave Sent from my iPhone > On May 21, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Jörg Schmidt <joe...@j-m-schmidt.de> wrote: > > >> From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > >> Reread what Simon wrote. Key phrase is those who work on both. >> >> Also IBM as a company left the project 2.5 years ago and Rob >> left a year ago. > > Have the TDF members ever apologized for their insults to Rob (and other > Apache members)? > Has the TDF ever criticized those who spread FUD over AOO? > >> In this case it is not helpful to reopen >> these hurts and past issues. > > I think that LO and AOO are two independent projects and that both have their > right to existence. > > Some LO members, on the other hand, think it should only be LO, and that LO > is the successor to OOo. We can not accept this because the truth is the > OpenOffice is the original and LO is the fork. > > What does TDF do? Where does it call for reconciliation? Where does it > criticize its own community members to spread FUD? > > > Did you read what was written of "Meh" today? Where is the criticism of the > TDF against such mailing list posts? > > And please understand that such statements, as she pronounced "Meh", should > damage AOO. > > And tell me: where are the AOO members doing the same on LO mailing lists? I > do not see anyone. > > > > greetings, > Jörg > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
