Maybe we should think about a way to handle such a situation better in the future?
There can always be circumstances when a person becomes "unavailable", but I assume the PMC did a discussion on that topic. Matthias Am 17.04.2017 um 10:30 schrieb Marcus: > Am 17.04.2017 um 10:06 schrieb Matthias Seidel: >> But I will leave it to the release manager to decide... > > then you won't be lucky as Ariel is silent since some weeks. > > Marcus > > > >> Am 17.04.2017 um 09:21 schrieb Marcus: >>> Am 17.04.2017 um 01:17 schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >>>> Matthias Seidel wrote: >>>>> I would be happy to commit them and ask for 4.1.4. release >>>>> blocker... ;-) >>>> >>>> I would prefer to keep 4.1.4 for important bugfixes and commit this >>>> type >>>> of enhancements to trunk for 4.2.0, otherwise we risk to settle too >>>> much >>>> on 4.1.x for no reason. That said, I'm not the Release Manager, so >>>> please go ahead with committing to trunk (which must be done >>>> anyway) and >>>> then feel free to ask for 4.1.4 too if you wish! >>> >>> Matthias, thanks for your great work and enthusiasm. >>> >>> When thinking about the term "release blocker" I would expect some >>> serious problems that prevent the users from using OpenOffice or at >>> least a larger part of its functionality. >>> >>> A new graphic looks easy to handle but would also put the bar lower >>> for other issues. So, we shouldn't accept any new exceptions. IMHO we >>> have already enough. >>> >>> Therefore I second Andrea's opinion that this "fix" shouldn't go into >>> the 4.1.4 release. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
