On 30/10/2016 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127201
I would advise against this. I'll explain the reason: Pootle does not
have the 4.1.x strings, so translators in Pootle are translating strings
that came from trunk (4.2.0, so to say). This means we don't have a
clean way for reintegrating strings into the AOO41x branches.
That said, I forgot to add that all experience we manage to gain in
merging translation is welcome. So, while I'm still perplexed on a
global unconditional import from Pootle (another reason: some strings
got moved and now need to be translated again in Pootle, if I recall
correctly), any "controlled" import for one or two specific language(s)
is surely an experiment worth doing.
Regards,
Andrea.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
