> From: Jim Jagielski [mailto:j...@jagunet.com]
> >> Any real reason to name it 4.2.0 ? > > > > Two years of miscellaneous changes and fixes, a radically > improved build system, unit tests at build time, updates of a > lot of libraries, support for new languages, new > translations, new dictionaries... if this is not 4.2.0 it > should be named 5.0. > > > > That was kind of my thoughts... or maybe call it 4.5.0 > > The idea is to represent the "re-charged" AOO project with > a meaningful change in version. OK, an idea which I understand. But one could, in this context, not to think about a completely different way of naming? (a) What if we took us Ubuntu as an example? Ubuntu 4.16 is called "Xenial Xerus" and AOO 4.2 or 4.5 or 5.0 (and so on) might be called "Lively Phoenix"? (just an example) (b) Or you choose a more formal type of label them. OK, "AOO XP" would probably not so great, but what would be, for example, with "AOO NE" (for new experience)? Jörg --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
