> On Sep 15, 2016, at 10:13 AM, Jim Jagielski <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > >> On Sep 15, 2016, at 9:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> That would be challenging but useful then. For epm, as Ariel already >> explained to you, we use a patched version so it's not a trivial task to >> replace it, but probably it's feasible. >> > > It looks like most of the epm patch is not related to OSX (except for > some minor things)... The reliance on PackageMaker is a major > hurdle and one which will only get worse as things go on. > > epm 4.3 may not be feasible for non-OSX but so far it's been a > major boon for the Mac. > > Has anyone been in contact w/ Michael Sweet to get our required > patches into his distro??
In the meantime, I'll look at patching 4.3 w/ the 3.7 patch to create a cleanly applying one. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
