I was actually (mostly) joking about the OS/2 thing. Not that I wasn't a raving OS/2 fan up until about 2000. But for AOO, I think the answers to the other five questions are more important at the moment. Does anybody have any commentary on those topics?
Thanks, Phil This message optimized for indexing by NSA PRISM On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > Am 09/02/2016 09:24 PM, schrieb Fernando Cassia: > >> On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 3:44 PM, Phillip Rhodes<motley.crue....@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> 6. Do we still build for OS/2? :-) (Sorry, I'm sentimental old fool). >>> >> > please have a look here [1] and here [2] for newer OS/2 builds that are > indeed not part of AOO but offered by volunteers. > > [1] http://www.openoffice.org/porting/index.html > [2] http://www.bitwiseworks.com/press/20151218.php > > Marcus > > The OO.o OS/2 builds have ALWAYS been done by OS/2 enthusiasts, not the >> main project (not OO.o nor AOO). >> The last "officially supported" release done for OS/2 was StarOffice 5.1a >> back in the Sun days and before OO.o AFAIR >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
