> -----Original Message----- > From: Marcus [mailto:marcus.m...@wtnet.de] > Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 13:43 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage > > Am 08/15/2016 09:10 PM, schrieb Dennis E. Hamilton: > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Kay sch...@apache.org [mailto:ksch...@apache.org] > >> Sent: Monday, August 15, 2016 08:59 > >> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: [PATCH DOWNLOAD] Draft for the hotfix webpage > >> > >> On 08/13/2016 02:16 PM, Marcus wrote: > >>> As we have now the patched library file and Readme for all > platforms, > >>> IMHO not much more is needed to go public with the hotfix. Therefore > >>> I've created a draft version of the hotfix download webpage: > >>> > >>> http://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2- > >> patch1/hotfix.html > >>> > >>> Please review and tell me your feedback. > > [orcmid] > > > > I have a number of items. I can fix the URLs in (2) below after I > have updated the Windows set. > > > > 1. This is worded as if it is the advisory. I assume this is, > rather, something that should be linked to from an update of the > advisory. I request that it be a description of the HotFix. It could > link to the advisory, of course. RECOMMENDATION: Have the emphasis be > on this describing release of the hotfix for CVE-2016-1513. > > OK, seems indeed not clear enough. > > > 2. Download and Installation. Currently, this page is at > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.2- > patch1/hotfix.html>. It has *ABSOLUTE* URLs to the binaries and source > and the various hashes. WHEN GENERAL DISTRIBUTION OCCURS, this page and > all of the binaries and source pages will be at > > <https://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/4.1.2-patch1>. > > Please remember that it's just a draft of what is available at the > moment. ;-) That's why the URLs for source and binaries differ already. > Of course all URLs will change when everything is available at dist/ and > no longer dev/. > > RECOMMENDATION: In the Download& Installation table, make all URLS > *RELATIVE* to the HotFix page, since when it is staged to release and > then to archive, the links will always work. > > NOTE. When we make general distribution, we stage the HotFix > HTML page and the binaries subfolder to > > <https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/openoffice/4.1.2-patch1> > using SVN copies. In 24-48 hours or so that material will show up > automatically on archive.apache.org and we can make the general > distribution announcement. The dist.apache.org materials can be removed > when that happens. WARNING. The Windows material is not ready, and some > renaming will happen. That should all be done by the end of Tuesday > (GMT). > > The current location of the hotfix webpage is of course is not the final > one. It will be there where the other webpages are: at w.oo.o. > > I've just put it into SVN to have it not yet on the public OO website. [orcmid]
LOL. I thought that is where you wanted to keep it [;<). Because it is so specific to this HotFix, I think it would be great to leave it with the downloads and the archive.apache.org site, but link to it from openoffice.org. > > > 3. Next Step under Download and Installation. The README for > Windows addresses the way to Unzip and provides important information > about how the extract is into a folder of a default-determined name. I > don't know if the others provide comparable information and/or operating > from a terminal is assumed. > > Yes, more (Linux) or less (Mac) it should be comparable. > > > 4. How to verify the download& installation. Verifying the Zip is > sufficient. The table does not identify the files those check cases are > from so it is not at all clear what value this is. RECOMMENDATION: If > it is valuable, we should include the additional hashes inside the Zips, > and provide the size and time stamp information in the individual README > files. > > Yes, right. "Old file" and "New file" is for sure not exact enough which > file it is about. And the other file-based data can be moved to the > Readme's, too. > > > That way there is no redundancy and the information is maintained in > > exactly one place. > > <nitpicker> > Ahm, no. ;-) At the moment we have it at a single place. When we split > it into the 4 Readme's then we have 4 places to maintain. > </nitpicker> > > But at the end you are right. The webpage contains some details that > should be moved to the respective Readme. > > I'll finish the changes when I'm back from a trip on Thursday or Friday. > > Thanks for your feedback. > > Marcus > > > > >> Looks good to me. > >> > >> -- > >> Kay Schenk > >> Apache OpenOffice > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
