On Sat, Apr 9, 2016 at 3:01 AM, Marcus <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 04/07/2016 12:43 AM, schrieb Kay Schenk:
>
>> [...]
>>
>> A warning -- unless you can see an SVN commit clearly
>> stating that the fix has been ported to one of our existing
>> releases, it may take a bit of investigation into the
>> release branch area to determine this.
>>
>> release branch area--
>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/branches/
>>
>>
>> Our new resolution of FIXED_WITHOUT_CODE should result in
>> CLOSING without any further investigation.
>>
>> Thoughts on undertaking this cleanup?
>>
>
> many issues are commented with "fixed in CMS xyz" but there are no real
> commits visible. Not every CWS was committed into Trunk before the project
> and software was transferred to Apache.
> So, do we have a list of outstanding CWS from 2011 that were not
> transferred to Apache?
>
> Thanks
As far as I know, NONE of the CWS (child workspaces) were ported when the
project was brought into Apache.
For a while, these were "available" somewhere, but that archive
disappeared at some point, at least from its original location.
I
also believe looking at the activity when OpenOffice was brought in the
ASF, that some of this code may have been committed to /trunk by
individuals, but the spaces where not merged in their entirety.
Generally, these kinds of changes you find referenced in BZ may as well be
considered OBSOLETE I guess.
You're doing a considerable job on all this byt the way! :) Thanks.
>
>
> Marcus
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK
"Time spent with cats is never wasted."
-- Sigmund Freud
