Patricia, Take a look at main/sal/inc/osl/profile.h
Methinks that the code identified in <https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126669> might not be built for current releases on Windows or Linux. You'll see that there are filename suffixes such as .rc and .ini used. I doubt that has anything to do with handling profiles now. Is there a way we can check that the code is not built and/or and these profile functions are not used? I don't know about builds for OS/2 and other downstream builds that we don't make ourselves. And if the code is really obsolete, we should prune it from trunk and source releases. - Dennis > -----Original Message----- > From: Patricia Shanahan [mailto:p...@acm.org] > Sent: Saturday, February 20, 2016 20:57 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: Some thoughts on the learning curve > > > > On 2/20/2016 8:39 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > I sympathize with Pedro's observation. > > > > Meanwhile, although I am not an expert, I could stand to buddy up on > > the following profile-related situation: > > <https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=126669>. > > Looks interesting. I am familiar with pthread and memory management > issues, so it may be a good area for me to work on. > > Patricia > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
