On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 1:59 PM, Damjan Jovanovic <dam...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi > > Recently I fixed a bad 9 year old bug #60307 with at least 6 duplicates > [and still broken in at least LO 4.2.8.2 :-)], now allowing searching for > cells by the value displayed after formatting (eg. 30/11/2015 formatted > into "30 November 2015" can be found when you search for "November" with > "Search in" set to "Values"). Also through repeated failures until I copied > how Writer already does it, today also fixed #35093, an infamous 11 year > old 15 vote issue in Calc ("Current selection only" should automatically be > checked if the "Find & Replace" dialog is opened with cells already > selected; since users expect this from other spreadsheets and the option is > invisible by default, it can cause wrong cells to change when doing > "Replace"). > > Now I am wondering what other enhancements to that dialog would be good to > make while it's fresh in my mind. Some ideas from Bugzilla: > > Visibility of options. In a comment on #87032 it is suggested the dialog > should always be expanded so all options are visible, but #39453 is all > about trying to shrink it as it hides cells under it. #39453 was filed in > 2004 when monitors were smaller and had lower resolutions, so dialog size > mattered more, but small devices are becoming ubiquitous today too. If the > dialog should remain expandable, which options should be visible with it > contracted? Comments in #35093 propose including "Current selection only" > and "Regular expressions", although I think the "Search in" is far more > commonly used than "Regular expressions". > > Search in what? #106857 wants the default to be "Values" instead of the > current "Formulas", but Excel (2007) uses "Formulas", so it might surprise > users even though it is more natural. > > Columns or rows? #106857 again wants "Columns" as default even though Excel > (2007) has rows. > > Use the value of the cell under the cursor as the find text? #73544 asks > for this. Calc currently uses the last value searched for instead, as does > Excel (2007). Instead of the cell under the cursor, we could use a single > selected cell instead: it is rather hard to select only 1 cell by accident > (with the cursor on it, you have to Ctrl+Click it or Shift+Right+Left), and > you wouldn't need to search just 1 cell, so I think it's safe to treat a > single selected cell as the find text. Another AOO innovation? > > Selection during the dialog? If cells are selected during the dialog, > should we automatically check the "Current selection only" box? We > currently uncheck it and gray it out if cells are deselected during the > dialog, but only enable it without checking it if cells are selected again. > Excel (2007) doesn't even have this option: if cells are selected only they > will be searched/replaced, if no cells are selected all will be. If we want > to copy Excel's behaviour then we should check it on reselection. But > Writer doesn't do that for multi-line text selections either, so it should > probably be changed too (and other apps?). > > Any other proposals? Should we ask our current users what they want (how?)? > > Thank you > Damjan > Thank you for posting this question. I started a thread on the en user forum: https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=106&t=80312 Regards, Franics