> -----Original Message----- > From: Jürgen Schmidt [mailto:jogischm...@gmail.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2015 10:04 > To: dev@openoffice.apache.org > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] [VOTE] Release 4.1.2-RC3 as OpenOffice 4.1.2 > > On 27/10/15 17:45, Regina Henschel wrote: > > Hi Jürgen, > > > > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: > >> > >> checked the build in the morning and en-US built was successful. > Besides > >> the fact that we have some issues on newer Linux distros (we ever > had) > >> the src package is fine. > >> > >> @Regina, I still have no ideas what the problem is in your env but > maybe > >> you can give one of the tar balls a try instead of the zip. > > > > I have use apache-openoffice-4.1.2-r1709696-src.tar.gz now and > unzipped > > it in Cygwin. That source builds fine then. I have added a note to > > > https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_b > y_step#Windows_7 > > not to use Windows tools for unpacking. > > good that we figured out why it didn't worked with the zip but it is > strange. We can think about dropping the zip completely. Users have to > use cygwin anyway and probably have the tools in place already. I would > drop the zip src release in the future. [orcmid]
Regina, can you explain what Windows tool you mean? Do you mean not using the default way that Windows will open/extract a .zip file? Do you mean that a Zip utility like WinZip or 7Zip should not be used? I assume the change you mean is where you use the Cygwin bash session and use tar to unpack the tar.bz2 source. Is that correct? (Or has the change not been pushed yet?) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
