On 07/05/2015 11:03 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: >> I seem to recall that we should no longer put these kinds of >> pre-developmets on people.apache.org. Is this the case > > It is fine to use people.apache.org for custom builds and test builds. > It is a space clearly marked as a "personal" space of the various > committers.
Ok, done... Build can be obtained from: http://people.apache.org/~kschenk/CentOS6_test/en-US/ md5 file generated on my local machine and pasted into http://people.apache.org/~kschenk/CentOS6_test/en-US/en-US_md5 verified on people.apache.org > > That said, it's surely good know that OpenOffice builds correctly on > CentOS 6, even though I don't have a system ready to test your packages > at the moment. Well maybe someone else will! :) Mostly I wanted to do this because of our previous discussions concerning CentOS5 vs CentOS6. I was hoping that those using our previous Linux builds could check this out to see if it feasible for us to move onto CentOS6 vs CentOS5 as our Linux reference platform. I had been building on Linux-32 so I just decided to stay with that for (potentially) a 4.1.2 release. Mostly the problems I encountered concerned autoconf much to my surprise! > > Regards, > Andrea. > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > -- -------------------------------------------- MzK "We can all sleep easy at night knowing that somewhere at any given time, the Foo Fighters are out there fighting Foo." -- David Letterman --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
