On 8 June 2015 at 16:58, Regina Henschel <rb.hensc...@t-online.de> wrote:
> Hi Jürgen, > > is it OK to commit the patch? > if it not ok to commit the patch, then I wonder how the files was committed in the first place. If it is not ok, then the files should be deleted. We cannot have files in trunk without the proper ALv2 license. Furthermore we cannot make a release with these files. I recommend applying the patch. Deleting the files might have sideeffects. rgds jan i. > > Kind regards > Regina > > Jürgen Schmidt schrieb: > > On 06/05/15 14:45, jan i wrote: >> >>> On 6 May 2015 at 14:14, Gavin McDonald <gmcdon...@apache.org> wrote: >>> >>> Hi All, >>>> >>>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/rat-output.html >>>> >>>> shows 30 files that need attention in getting valid license headers >>>> adding. >>>> >>>> A quick look shows to me that we should probably insert ASF license >>>> Headers >>>> in all of those files. >>>> >>>> If nobody gets to it before me I’ll provide a patch to that effect. >>>> >>>> I just had a look, all the files should really have ALv2 added. I >>> wonder >>> what happened, because I know a couple of these files used >>> to have ALv2. I will take a look at "svn log" later. >>> >>> The archives however is covered by the general LICENSE file, when we >>> make a >>> distribution. >>> >>> Patches are welcome. >>> rgds >>> jan I. >>> >>> >> >> the files were from a new project that is currently stalled, I believe >> the headers were simply forgotten. They are not part of the office yet >> and if they are in the source tarball it is just a mistake. >> >> Juergen >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
