I think is a good idea to use Git as a full fledge repo. +1
On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 3:43 AM, jan i <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hi. > > > > We have now for a while had a readonly Git copy of our svn repo. > > > > Should we move to a full git repo, making it easier for new developers to > > participate (although it is in no way a guarantee, that it will attract > new > > people) by lowering the barrier. > > > > For more documentation on Git at Apache see > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/ > > > > Moving to a full git repo (see http://git.apache.org/), would mean > giving > > up our current SVN repo, but history etc. will be available in Git > instead. > > > > The choice is there, and it is just a matter of how people want to work. > > > > thoughts ? > > > > rgds > > jan I. > > > > I'm not sure I understand the comment about making things easier but then > I'm not a git user currently. I'm good with svn. > I know we have read only git right now. > > > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "An old horse for a long, hard road, > a young pony for a quick ride." > -- Texas Bix Bender > -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor 882C 4389 3C27 E8DF 41B9 5C4C 1DB7 9D1C 7F4C 2614
