Rob Weir wrote:
I must have missed it, but when did you call for nominations? And how long are we giving to nominations?
All of this started on January 1st and we can't go on and discuss forever. Everybody has had the opportunity to nominate and be nominated. We need something that converges. People who are stopping the process must realize they are damaging the project by reiterating the same discussions. If we vote, I would add an option "None of the above" and ask that people who prefer that one are constructive and suggest some concretely verified different options.
And can we have an explanation why the results of the last vote were just ignored?
Vote was canceled, in agreement with the only candidate, since the number of binding -1 votes (especially compared to the number of voters) was making it clear that I couldn't conclude we had consensus. This is basically what I wrote at the time http://markmail.org/message/jlwujrial43unk4j ; maybe I don't understand your question, but I'm confident I didn't do anything wrong.
We don't even need a formal vote. There are projects that are able to change their Chair with a 3-day discussion on the private list. Here we chose to do everything in public, with the obvious noise that comes with it. And this requires constructive attitude.
Regards, Andrea. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
