On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 11:12 AM, Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:49:13 -0700 > Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Can we get some additional feedback this particular issue? See comments. > > > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121312 > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > MzK > > > > "For evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing." > > -- Simon Wiesenthal > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > > > Speaking from memory I remember that some Java 6 versions were much slower > than others. Villeroy has written a useful tutorial for the en-Forum > https://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=74&t=69896 > on the subject. > > I privately asked Villeroy by email if he had any clue why some versions > of Java were friendlier to OO than others, but he hadn't. > > > -- > Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> > Thanks Rory -- I asked about this particular issue here because I didn't really know how this issue should be closed. We currently recommend java ver 7. It's VERY odd to me that in this case, ver 6 seemd to work and now 8 seems to work but NOT ver 7. I imagine this can be isolated to a particular reason, and if so, we should document it in the Release Notes or something. On the other hand, we could use more testing on the supplied DB for various Java versions and OS environments as well. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "For evil to flourish, it only requires good men to do nothing." -- Simon Wiesenthal
