(Moving discussion to dev@) On Thu, Jun 05, 2014 at 01:02:11PM +0100, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: > Hello! > > What should I write there then? > > The name there is the link that appears in the extension manager on > the right of the extension. > > For months that it has been there, and no one ever said anything about > it.
May be nobody takes a look at the Extension Manager? But from a technical point of view a) this project is not the maintainer b) marking this project as the "publisher" of the dictionary extension is binding an ASF project to the release of a product without the Apache License > Next month I will release another update and replace it for what is > best. The publisher is optional in the description.xml, so you can omit it; or, if you want to keep the publisher for the link, put yourself or a fictional name as publisher. > On 05/06/2014 12:17, Ariel Constenla-Haile wrote: > >Hello Marco, > > > >On Fri, May 30, 2014 at 10:12:24AM +0100, Marco A.G.Pinto wrote: > >>Hello, > >> > >>I have created a beta .OXT of the English dictionaries: > >>https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/30674540/ApacheOpenOffice41-DicTest-20140601.oxt > >> > >>I have updated: - en_CA (Canadian) (updated: 2014-05-13) - en_GB > >>(British) (updated: 2014-06-01) <- The date is 1-JUN because it is > >>feature freeze - en_US (American) (updated: 2014-05-13) > >> > >>If no one finds any issues, on Monday I will release an official > >>version. > >The publisher name in description.xml shouldn't be "Apace > >OpenOffice", this project is not maintaining any dictionary due to > >license incompatibility. Regards -- Ariel Constenla-Haile La Plata, Argentina
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
