On Tue, May 20, 2014 at 12:25 PM, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 20/05/14 17:51, Rory O'Farrell wrote: >> On Tue, 20 May 2014 09:04:04 +0200 >> Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 20/05/14 00:59, Kay Schenk wrote: >>>> >>>> On 05/17/2014 04:54 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >>>>> On 17/05/2014 Juergen Schmidt wrote: >>>>>> Anybody can propose things and we can discuss it. ... >>>>>> nobody should expect that others do the work. >>>>> >>>>> This is an excellent summary indeed. On one hand we can discuss and >>>>> collect ideas, but on the other hand these ideas need to be concretely >>>>> supported by developer resources to pass from the "brainstorming" phase >>>>> to the "planning" phase. >>>>> >>>>> At the level of brainstorming, for example, I believe that a priority >>>>> for a new major release would be a better integration with our online >>>>> resources (easier ways, built-in in the application, to reach our sites >>>>> for feedback, volunteering, support...). But if and how this can happen >>>>> will depend on the interest that current and new developers have in this. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Andrea. >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>>>> >>>> >>>> A new AOO 5.0 release page has been created on cwiki to collect ideas. >>>> But, I would think all discussion needs to be on "dev" and not the >>>> comments area on that page. >>>> >>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+5.0 >>>> >>> >>> is it useful to create dummy pages when we don't have agreed on a >>> version number for the next release? I don't believe that the next >>> version will be a AOO 5.0 ;-) >>> >>> Juergen >> >> Planning for AOO 5.0 doesn't stop us working on a point release. Consider it >> as a longer term project. Some of the proposals might be too complex for >> incorporation into a point release. >> > > well don't get me wrong but on a planning page I would add only items > that are more concrete and and where a developer agreed to take of it. > General ideas should we better collect on some kind of backlog page. I > don't like to make long lists and drop half of them later on. But that > is my personal opinion. >
Bugzilla has items classified as defects, enhancements and features. IMHO, that is a good place for tracking feature ideas that do not have a current dev owner and are not yet assigned to a specific future release. -Rob > > Juergen > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
