On 16 May 2014 15:41, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently investigating in Google's C++ test framework [1] which > seems to be quite powerful and a good replacement for cppunit which has > not the proper license. > > My idea is to use gtest as general C++ unit testing framework in our > build environment and replace long term all cppunit based tests with new > or adapted tests using gtest. > > A further goal is to use this testing framework for new C++ unit tests > and enable these new unit tests by default. Means I plan to introduce a > new build requisite and let the user actively disable unit testing on > demand (eg. configure ... --disable-unit-tests). > > I believe it is a good thing to enable these unit test by default and > let them disable on demand. We want to get informed if something gets > wrong as soon as possible. > > But we will have different options to complete a build even if an unit > tests fails. But more detailed information will come later. > > For the moment I just want to propose this enhancement (from my pov) and > trying to build it on Linux, Mac and Windows. > +1 speaking as one who knows both cppunit and gtest.
rgds jan I. > > > Juergen > > > [1] https://code.google.com/p/googletest/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > >
