Am 02/13/2014 10:02 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
Am 11.02.2014 um 00:55 schrieb "Marcus (OOo)"<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>:
Am 02/10/2014 10:22 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
Am 10.02.2014 um 21:46 schrieb "Marcus (OOo)"<marcus.m...@wtnet.de>:
Am 02/10/2014 08:53 PM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi,
On Sat, Feb 8, 2014 at 8:33 PM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
Am 01/30/2014 10:52 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
Am 01/30/2014 08:38 AM, schrieb Oliver-Rainer Wittmann:
Hi Markus,
below you find the output of my iMac running Mac OS X 10.7
thanks for the 10.7 data. At least here I can do some scripting changes.
From my point of view it should be assured that Mac users running Mac
OS X 10.6 or earlier are _not_ directed to a download of AOO 4.1.
Instead they should be directed to AOO 4.0.1 together with a note saying
that AOO 4.1 needs Mac OS X version 10.7 or later.
This depends on when 4.0.1 will be available in the archive. So, let's
see what will be possible.
Nevetheless, as I don't know if older and newer browsers than 10.7
identifying itself in the same way, I need more data.
@Oliver: Can you help me here, too?
@Oliver and all Mac users:
I've finished a first test. Please have a look:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/index.html
After "downgrading" my iMac to 10.6 [1] I got
Apache OpenOffice 4.1.0 for *MacOS X (10.6 or older)* is not available.
Please choose another platform build from the alternative download
webpage.<http://archive.apache.org/dist/openoffice/>
It seems the order to present the correct text and link inside the green box
was not correct. Is it now better?
Previously, I did not follow the link and thus, I did not notice that itnwas
the intended one.
Text looks better, but the link target would confuse unexperienced user from my
point of view - there too much clicks needed to get to the corresponding
directory containing the packages and then there are too much files with
similar names.
Better would be a direct link to the the installation package of the 4.0.1
which would be also available at sourceforge.net as I assume.
When we can be sure that the previous versions will remain longer on
Sourceforge then OK.
I've implemented a special behaviour for old Mac builds to provide assembled
download URLs, so I hope I've covered that part. Please test - and also the
linked checksum files.
In my special downgraded OS X the test is ok.
Thats good to see.
Just one minor issue:
The tooltip for the Release Notes link talks about 4.1.0. The link goes
correctly to the 4.0.1 Release Notes, only the tooltip is wrong.
In my normal OS X the test is ok, except the link to the Release Notes.
Yes, this was hardcoded. Now exchanged with a variable, depending on the
respective version.
BTW:
Cross the fingers that I'll get access to a 10.5.x machine after the
weekend.
Thanks
Marcus
It would be great, if it could be added that 4.0.1 is available for Mac OS
X 10.6 or older incl. corresponding link.
Yes, that was intended.
[1] changing key "ProductVersion" in
/System/Library/CoreServices/SystemVersion.plist
Interesting feature. :-)
If you see problems, please tell me the data from the analyze webpage:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html
Marcus
BTW:
I've tested with 10.6 data (as far as I can do this without a Mac ;-) ).
Older versions to recognize are derived from 10.6 but may not work. So,
please test also with other old versions.
Thanks in advance
Marcus
On 28.01.2014 23:24, Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 12/20/2013 02:47 PM, schrieb Herbert Duerr:
On 19.12.2013 17:58, jan i wrote:
On 19 December 2013 17:29, Herbert Duerr<hdu_...@alice.de> wrote:
The new Mac port looks quite good. I uploaded a current version to my
page
[1]. Jürgen already mentioned it will only work for OSX 10.7 and up.
It is
based on todays trunk, which already contains a lot of fixes and
enhancements compared to our latest release. For details you can
have a
look at our progress tracking page [2].
[1] http://people.apache.org/~hdu/
[2] http://people.apache.org/~hdu/izlist9.htm
In the early days of next year I plan to update our trunk so the new
port
becomes active. To build it yourself you'll need XCode4 then. XCode4
comes
with the 10.7 SDK.
+1 the wiki "build instructions" should also be updated.
+1
Do we also need to update information on the download page (e.g.
that we
only support OSX 10.7 and up) ?
As Jürgen already mentioned the installation files are already
protected. We should also update the release notes, etc.
If it is possible to know the OS version from e.g. the browser's User
Agent then we should update the download page too. Maybe we already
have
such a mechanism. Does anyone happen to have OSX 10.3 or earlier? What
happens when you go to the OpenOffice download page?
Good point.
Can someone help me and test the download webpage with different OSX
versions? I need the user agent text fromthe used browsers (Firefox and
Safari).
Or better, please use this webpage and send me the raw data from the
table:
http://www.openoffice.org/download/test/analyze.html
If there is a way to recognize the differences, then I can build
something around the scripting.
Otherwise I would suggest a general hint text when OSX in general was
detected.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
