On 2/4/14 2:11 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
> Jürgen Schmidt wrote:
>> I noticed that since last week I got always an extensions update for the
>> bundled English dictionary when I work/test with a new profile.
> 
> This is expected and it has been discussed extensively on both the l10n
> and dev list. The best way to catch up is probably that you look for
> messages from Marco Pinto.
> 
>> We bundle 2 dictionaries which seems to be English. I am not sure what
>> the difference is or which one should be used. I am wondering why it is
>> different and why nl and ru doesn't bundle the same as en*, de or it.
> 
> One is a dictionary for multiple variants of English (en-US, en-GB...);
> the other one is for en-US only.
> 
>> [ language=en.* || language=de || language=it ]
>>      3c3f841f5d40403bcc4d6bb685a38160
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-extensions/files/17102/1/dict-en.oxt/download
>>
>> "dict-en.oxt"
> 
> This needs to be updated, it's documented here
> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124127
> and I will take care of it later this week.
> 
>> But more confusing do I find the fact that the notified update download
>> a dictionary with the name "dict-en-marcoagpinto-20140107.oxt". What is
>> this for an dictionary and is it correct that it uses the same extension
>> identifier than "dict-en.oxt". Why is the name part of the file name?
> 
> It is correct, since the extension was reassigned to Marco after he
> volunteered to make new releases. The fact that the OXT is named
> dict-en-marcoagpinto-20140107.oxt and not simply dict-en.oxt should
> indeed be fixed, it doesn't harm but it's easier to be consistent.
> 
>> If this is the intended new one I would suggest to update the existing
>> "dict-en.oxt" asap that we bundle this new one. Or if not use a
>> different extension identifier.
> 
> Identifier must be the same, see above. But indeed let's simplify the
> name in Marco's next release.
> 
>> We should avoid that we bundle an old dictionary with 4.1 and all new
>> users get directly an extension update.
> 
> Obviously. Again, this has been discussed at length on the l10n and dev
> lists.
> 
>> Any further information from people who knows more about the details?
> 
> I think I summarized most of the discussion. But looking for messages
> from Marco in the l10n and dev archives will bring you up-to-date. And
> the next actions would be:
> 1) Marco releases his next update during this week (or at his earliest
> convenience) and names it simply dict-en.oxt
> 2) I address https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=124127
> bundling his new version.
> 3) We keep the dictionary frozen until 4.1 is released, publishing new
> versions only some weeks after release.
> 

thanks for the summary, I haven't followed the related thread in detail.
All is fine to me, I just wanted to raise awareness for this once again
because we are going closer towards AOO 4.1.

Juergen


> Regards,
>   Andrea.
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to