On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 8:07 AM, Herbert Duerr <h...@apache.org> wrote: > >> On 21.11.2013 01:27, Kay Schenk wrote: >> >>> [...] >>> >>> short update...in building xml2cmp/source/finder >>> >>> the reference to >>> >>> # include BOOST_TR1_STD_HEADER(utility) in >>> >>> ../boost/tr1/detail/config_all.hpp >>> >>> fails for me either from the externally installed boost or my local >>> install. >>> >> >> BOOST_TR1_STD_HEADER(utility) should find a C++ header named utility [1]. >> Since we are using boost/tr1 it should be found from >> solver/*/*/inc/boost/tr1/tr1/utility >> >> [1] http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/utility/ > > > right...I mean I *understood* that was supposed to happen, but somehow the > logic in config_all.hpp isn't getting there. I did see some notes from the > boost docs on how to set some of these things manually, though. I HAVE the > utility header -- but this file can not find it. > > > >> >> >> I have no idea why this never happened before the stlport removal >>> but there you have it. I guess to make this work, I will need to define >>> BOOST_TR1_STD_HEADER properly at least. >>> >> >> Do you happen to have set a HAVE_STL_INCLUDE_PATH manually? > > > um...not that I know of -- I didn't do it, but maybe one of these other > headers did it -- accidentally. Yeah, I saw a bunch of logic dealing with > STLPORT here, but, well, I am not a C++ expert. I will try to track this > down. > > I dumped the "supplied" boost and did a local install -- that went fine -- > thinking there were referencing problems somehow, but, alas, the same > problem in the same place. > > >> This could interfere with boost finding its own headers. So please >> undefine it. >> >> >> Herbert >> > > Thanks for all your help. I may not be able to get back to this for a few > days...but I will let you know what happens. > > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > “Unless someone like you cares a whole awful lot, > Nothing is going to get better. It's not.” > -- Dr. Seuss, The Lorax > After further investigation over the last 2 days, it is clear my "boost" installation needs configuration tweaks. This effects how it works not only with my local boost install but with the supplied one as well since the default headers and logic are exactly the same. On HAVE_STL_INCLUDE_PATH, should this be unset in some global header somewhere just to be sure it doesn't cause problems? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Cats do not have to be shown how to have a good time, for they are unfailing ingenious in that respect." -- James Mason
