On 10/30/2013 05:28 PM, Roberto Galoppini wrote: > A) Despite we'd love to be able to distinguish between 'maintained' and > 'umaintained' extensions there is no easy way to tell.
Let's take "Extension 6318" as an example. http://extensions.openoffice.org/en/project/extension-6318 Μaintainer: Unmaintained Extension ID: com.readability.ReadabilityIndices Release Date: 07/04/2013 Compatiblity: 3.4 Questions: Where is that "unmaintained" datapoint coming from? Why are extensions that have a non-descriptive name, and no explanation of what they are supposed to do, publicly available? ### On the LibreOffice extension page, when one goes to download an extension that hasn't been updated in the last year, there is a great big warning notice that it might be unmaintained. Surely something along those lines could be added to the download page of the AOO extension. jonathon
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
