On Sun, Oct 20, 2013 at 1:03 PM, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi > > due to a question I got, I read these 2 pages: > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOOW:Copyrights > > http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Authors_licensing_declaration > > First page refers to oracle, and second page does not even mention the > apache license. > > Is that really how we want it ? >
If you search the list archives for terms like "wiki" and "license" you will find lengthy discussions of this topic. The net of it is: we don't include the wiki in our releases. We don't package up or redistribute the wiki. The legacy OpenOffice.org project did not these things either. It was not covered by their CLA and it was not included in Oracle's grant to Apache. Apparently the rights were never centralized. So the first statement is accurate: content is copyright by Oracle or the original authors. However, it makes sense to include, and even encourage the Apache License 2.0 on that 2nd page. -Rob > I am not a legal adviser, but it seems wrong to me. > > rgds > jan I. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
