On Sat, Sep 28, 2013 at 5:17 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > On 25/09/2013 Rob Weir wrote: >> >> >> http://www.pcworld.com/article/2048446/apache-openoffice-4-0-review-new-features-easier-to-use-still-free.html >> Title is "Apache OpenOffice 4.0 review: New features, easier to use, still >> free" > > > Nice review, even though one of the initial sentences > --- > Like LibreOffice and OpenOffice.org, Apache OpenOffice "forked" from Oracle > OpenOffice (which grew from StarOffice) in 2010. > --- > it's so dense of errors that makes me wonder where people get information > from (to avoid confusion: the sentence contains several errors, but the most > disturbing one is that it portrays OpenOffice.org as a fork of Oracle > OpenOffice). >
We do have an "about" page that has the project history, but I don't think we have any prominent links to it: http://www.openoffice.org/about/ -Rob > Regards, > Andrea. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
