On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > Am 09/05/2013 12:20 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 5:37 PM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: >>> >>> Am 09/04/2013 10:47 PM, schrieb Rob Weir: >>> >>>> http://browsershots.org/http://www.openoffice.org/download/ >>>> >>>> I'm not sure anyone else can read that. It might be tied to a cookie. >>>> But I ran a test to render the download page on 135 browser/os >>>> combinations. It returns a PNG screenshot for each rendering. I >>>> looked for which combinations did not render the green download box. >>>> >>>> There were 5 failures. Two I don't think we care about: >>>> >>>> Dillo 3.0.2 / Debian 6.0 (squeeze) >>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> Kazehakase 0.5.8 / Debian 6.0 (squeeze) >>>> >>>> And 3 that we should care about: >>>> >>>> MSIE 5.5 / Windows 2008 R2 (Server) >>>> >>>> MSIE 6.0 / Windows 2008 R2 (Server) >>>> >>>> MSIE 7.0 / Windows 2008 R2 (Server) >>> >>> >>> >>> I don't agree here. Why do we have to support stone-old browsers? Because >>> they are available on a browser testing website? Come on. ;-) >>> >> >> I'm concerned with the error, since it it impacts the more modern IE 6 and >> 7. >> >> Looking at visits to our website over the past month I see this many >> users: >> >> IE 10 -- 857,499 >> IE 9 -- 250,591 >> IE 8 -- 420,215 >> IE 7 -- 69,914 >> IE 6 -- 27,172 >> IE 5.5 -- 69 >> >> So we're still getting nearly 100K visits/month from these older IE >> versions. > > > The 69 are not really impressive. But 27,000+ for MSIE 6 is surprising. > > >>> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_Explorer_5 >>> >>> It's old, MS is no longer supporting it, so IMHO it's done. Nearly the >>> same >>> for 6.0. >>> >> >> Right. But here is a common scenario. You need to reinstall Windows >> on a machine. Say it is XP or Vista. Both are supported today, but >> both have older browsers by default. Of course, the first thing you >> do on a new machine is run the Windows Updates. But in parallel with >> that you are downloading other software you need, Acrobat Reader, anti >> virus, 7-Zip, Notepad++, etc., and Apache OpenOffice. So you might >> end up with IE 8 in the end, after all the patches are applied. But >> you start your work with an earlier version, > > > I would expect that these people first get the basics up-to-date, then other > applications. > > >>>> The IE versions all give the same script error: >>> >>> >>> >>> However, if all browsers show the same error then a fix could get back >>> all 3 >>> into life at the same time. >>> >> >> That makes sense. > > > Yes, let's concentrate on the error. > > >>>> Line 330, Char 1, Code 0, Expected identifier, string or number >>>> >>>> This is an odd place for an error, since that appears to be in the >>>> middle of the commented out block for beta releases. >>>> >>>> Any ideas? >>> >>> >>> >>> Yes, if you search in the "index.html" which indeed doesn't make sense. >>> >>> When looking into "download.js" then you are in the middle of the >>> "getFilesize()" function. But I've no idea what the problematic point >>> could >>> be there. >>> >> >> I wonder if it could be >> http://www.openoffice.org/download/release_matrix.js? Could it be a >> coincidence that that file is exactly 329 lines long and the error is >> claimed to be in line 330? Maybe that unnecessary comma at the end of >> line 328 is the issue? > > > Hm, and what about "languages.js"? It has also a semicolon at the end but > the file has only 108 lines. In the "index.html" it will be imported before > the "release_matrix.js" (I don't know if this really the case) but there is > no hint for error. > > Anyway, let's try. In the test area: > > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html > http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/other.html > > I've committed the deletion of the characters in both files. I think we need > to wait another 24h until we are allowed to use Browsershots.org again, > right? - At least this is my experience. >
I don't know if that restriction is per client IP address or per host, but we're blocked either way, because of robots.txt on staging: http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/robots.txt But if it is OK to publish those changes we should be able to run another test now. -Rob > > Marcus > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
