On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Roberto Galoppini < roberto.galopp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 2013/8/22 Alexandro Colorado <j...@oooes.org> > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Andrew Rist <andrew.r...@oracle.com> > > wrote: > > > > > > > > On 8/22/2013 1:26 PM, Alexandro Colorado wrote: > > > > > >> Since the whole consensus process is completely broken, I would like > to > > >> just get a final confirmation if there a 'go' on the Wiki logo update > > >> which > > >> was reverted due to a regression by infra when setting the SVN. > > >> > > >> It has been aproximately 400 since the issue was raised on bugzilla > and > > >> ML. > > >> > > >> The bug with the new logo is here: > > >> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=122998< > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=122998> > > >> > > > I went and looked at the bug, and there are a number of images > attached. > > > Which one is the Wiki Logo you are proposing? > > > > > > > The one that says "Header for Wiki" the rest are for forum. > > > > > > > > > I was actually disappointed a bit that I didn't see something like the > > > logo at > > > http://forum.openoffice.org/**en/forum/download/file.php?id=** > > > 17705&mode=view< > > > http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/download/file.php?id=17705&mode=view> > > > which I thought was very promising. > > > > > > > That is a different discussion, like I mentioned before, consistant > > branding is not only about drawing a logo but about a whole HTML/CSS > revamp > > of different sites. Not something you can just draw, but rather change > the > > structure of the different systems (mediawiki, phpBB, plain HTML and > > Drupal). And reskin them with the same look and feel, something that we > > need to agree upon. But not now, we just want to switch the logo at this > > moment to the current AOO 4 one. > > > > > > > > > > > > One question I have is: Why do we have the light blue background? I > > think > > > that looks much better and more consistent with the general site in > > white: > > > http://forum.openoffice.org/**en/forum/download/file.php?id=** > > > 17720&mode=view< > > > http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/download/file.php?id=17720&mode=view> > > > > > > > The site design was never really agreed, we inherit the design from > Oracle > > (2 years ago). Now a new design is being done by the Extension/Template > web > > team and the trend is to adopt it from the even older 'twirl design' that > > was done back in 2008. > > > > This concern should be address to Roberto Galopinni who seems to be in > > charge of that design. > > > > > I don't know what is the 'twirl design', all I know we just put together > the ingredients in a pretty clean header, if there is a consensus around a > different approach/style we'd just change it right away. > 'twirl design' is the theme that was before yours on extensions/themes, and currently on the wiki and previously on the www.openoffice.org site. http://ooo.nicubunu.ro/gfx/ooo_website_24.png > > Roberot > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org< > > dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Alexandro Colorado > > Apache OpenOffice Contributor > > http://www.openoffice.org > > > -- Alexandro Colorado Apache OpenOffice Contributor http://www.openoffice.org
