On Fri, 16 Aug 2013 13:25:09 -0300, Marcelo Santana <marcgsant...@yahoo.com.br> wrote: > > Hello Michael, > > > I watched my wife packaging two little programs for the Debian > > repository (she's not finished yet, but on a good way.) > > > > My resume is: > > > > It's one thing putting AOO into some deb packages. But it's another > > thing packing AOO in a proper way, so it's fit fpr the Debian > > repository. > > > > The second thing is a very hard job and IMO impossible without the > > friendly support of experienced Debian Developers. > > I absolutely agree with you, mainly with some complex things as the > AOO's deb packages. I was trying to understand how it was done with > LibreOffice deb packages[1] but I was worried whether I could take > advantage of what was already done because of the license. IMHO it > isn't a working for a only person, mainly thinking about the packaging > quality to be accept as an official Debian package in the future. I > believe would be good to maintain it by a team.
[1]http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-openoffice/libreoffice.git > *PS: BTW does anybody know how the AOO's Debian packages are built? > By chance are they converted from RPM to DEB via alien? Who is the > responsible for the deb packages building process? > > *PS2: I'm sorry for my not so good English. > > Regards, > > -- > Marcelo G. Santana (aka msantana) | GNU/Linux User number: #208778 > http://blog.msantana.eng.br | http://identi.ca/mgsantana > http://www.debianbrasil.org | http://br.gnome.org > GnuPG fprint: 88FB 5D63 ED02 3B5D 90D6 3A3E 8698 1CC9 89C5 5467
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
