janI wrote > On 1 August 2013 17:49, V Stuart Foote < > VStuart.Foote@
> > wrote: > >> Meanwhile, for Steve Yin, any chance of pushing the current ia2 branch >> back >> out to SVN, or better perfrom a merge with trunk and posting it. Having >> the buildbot binaries are nice, but at some point we need to start >> reviewing >> code to access IAccessibile2 (v1.3) compliance as well as look at the >> impact on the other accessible bridges depending on what is done to UAA >> and role >> and event manipulations for ia2. >> > > I would recommend we test IA2 in its branch, and once our QA people give > it thumbs up, merge it back to trunk. > > I do the same with l10n40, and as far as know rejuvenate01 follow that > same > "rules". > > Lets try to keep trunk free of major untested changes, that makes life > easier for everybody. > > rgds > jan I. Apologies, I was not clear. No intention to suggest that Steve Yin's work on the IA2 branch be merged back into the trunk at this time. Rather, that since he holds all work locally, and that the last posting to the ia2 SVN branch repo was when he'd last merged with trunk at r1484083 on May 18th, all work since then has not been published or reviewed by anyone other than Steve and his team in Beijing. Some of us are getting anxious since an implementation of IAccessible2 at 4.1.0 will necessitate a broad review of all the accessibility framework and will impact the UAA bridges supporting AT-SPI/ATK and NSAccessibility in addition to residuals of the Java Accessibility Bridge. Stuart -- View this message in context: http://openoffice.2283327.n4.nabble.com/IA2-branch-testing-of-r1484083-merege-with-trunk-tp4644296p4649161.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
