Thanks for the very prompt response, all looks good now. On 27 July 2013 15:16, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > Am 07/27/2013 12:15 PM, schrieb sebb: > >> On 27 July 2013 11:08, sebb<seb...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I hope this is the right place to report this. There does not seem to >>> be a Bugzilla category for website content, and "Contact Us" only >>> refers to website technical issues. >>> >>> http://www.openoffice.org/download/legacy/index.html >>> >>> has the following sentences: >>> >>> 1) It's highly recommended not to use them but only when there is no >>> better choice. >> >> >> The above text also appears on >> http://www.openoffice.org/download/archive.html > > > Thanks, also here it's corrected. > > Marcus > > > > >>> 2) OpenOffice.org is licensed under the GNU Lesser General Public >>> License v3 (LGPL v3). >>> >>> == >>> >>> 1) does not read well, it should be something like: >>> >>> "It's highly recommended not to use them *except* when there is no >>> better choice." >>> >>> 2) is very ambiguous. To what does "OpenOffice.org" refer? The >>> website? The phrase? Some legacy software? >>> >>> Please can it be clarified? >>> >>> Thanks. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
