Am 07/12/2013 07:18 PM, schrieb janI:
On 12 July 2013 18:49, Rob Weir<robw...@apache.org>  wrote:

In the past we drafted release notes on the wiki, and then moved them
to a location on the website.  I'd like to challenge our thinking on
this.

Wouldn't it be useful to keep the release notes as a "live" document
on the wiki, so we can easily update it with additional information on
known issues as they are found, especially after release?


I see your point, however I disagree.

I think the release doc. for 4.0 is part of the release and should be
frozen in svn like all other release artifacts. This is done by having it
as a static web page.

I support the doubts of Jan.

The release notes should be seen as an artifact from a release as they describe this. We can also go that far that we write down the SVN revision number into the release notes. Then they are really tied strictly to this release and nothing else.

We can then have a "latest information", which are live in wiki.

What about to put a link like this at the top of the release notes to give it more visible attention:

Text: "For the latest information about Apache OpenOffice 4.0 see
      this related Wiki page."
Link: http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/AOO400_Lastest_Info

Then new and important / noteable changes can be documented in the (more easily accessible) Wiki.

My 2 ct.

Marcus



Remember, even if the issue is not caused by AOO code, a new upgrade
to a dependent operating system or other 3rd party application can
cause new issues to appear at any time.  So keeping  the release notes
updated is important.


This issue is highly caused by AOO code, remember the release code is
tested with a given set of third party libraries and given versions of the
operating systems.

Release notes reflect the environment tested for the 4.0 release,
everything that comes later should either be kept in a separate document or
postponed to a new release.



Do we lose anything if we do this?  For example, is there a concern
that the wiki can not handle the load?


Wiki can handle the load (it must because a lot of people will search for
info).

Yes we loose trackability. Release notes is in svn (in my opinion).
Remember in wiki anybody can change, so if person X test AOO on platform Y
should he/she  then just update the release documentation, I hope not.

But again, your idea of a live document is good, I just see it as a second
document (similar to what a lot of companies does).

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Reply via email to