Am 06/09/2013 11:00 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
* Release Schedule is actually a "Release History", or timeline
Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule?
No, this would mix stable and unstable version information and we are
already quite paranoid on not linking unstable builds... So I would just
rename the link to "Release History" and keep it as it is.
The link points to the schedule, not to the wiki for downloading
snapshot builds. And I don't see any cross link to it.
* Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently
consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd
recommend a link "Extensions and Dictionaries" pointing to
extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.
Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak
about "Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries" and delete the
link in the nav sidebar.
Updating the blue box is OK. And for the right sidebar, I don't see a
risk with duplication, a lot of stuff is already duplicated: we can even
leave it as it and link "Dictionaries" to
http://extensions.openoffice.org ;
OK, updated.
> the important part is to avoid that
users are driven to a totally outdated page recommending now deprecated
and obsolete features like DicOOo.
What about the link to the building guide? I've lost the overview where
the best data is.
Marcus
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
