On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 12:38 PM, Andrea Pescetti <pesce...@apache.org> wrote: > Kay Schenk wrote: >> >> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 8:49 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >>> >>> >>> https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=apache_openoffice_one_year_50 >>> I'd like to get this out today. >> >> Very interesting. Especially the RPM vs Deb packaging information. > > > Nice post, a lot of good information. > > The RPM vs DEB seems more undecided to me than what Rob writes: it was > around 1:1, it is now around 1:1 and during the year it went up to 1.4:1 and > down to 0.8:1, but I wouldn't call it "a steady decline overtime". It should > be seen on a longer timescale, when our data span a longer period. Nothing > really important anyway. >
The other thing to note is the download script issue we had in the July/August time frame. Could that have had an impact on the RPM/DEB ratio? It is curious that the spike in RPM is the same time as the drop in 64-bit. -Rob > Regards, > Andrea. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
