[ top posting ] We have gone off topic a bit from the initial subject of this thread. But please feel free to add comments on the original subject if you feel inclined.
And, for those who have volunteered to continue helping with HSQL, thank you. On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Kay Schenk <kay.sch...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 30, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Michael Lam <mnsyl4...@verizon.net>wrote: > >> On 03/30/2013 04:30 PM, Andrea Pescetti wrote: >> >>> On 29/03/2013 Reizinger Zoltán wrote: >>> >>>> 2013.03.29. 17:25 keltezéssel, Michael Lam írta: >>>> >>>>> I have been working on updating the HSQL to the latest version. I have >>>>> most of the configure and build portion ready >>>>> >>>> >>> Thank you, Michael! While in general Base sees less attention from >>> developers, I suspect that if you have specific questions then someone >>> lurking on this list will come out. A lower-hanging fruit could be, in the >>> meantime, to get HSQLDB 1.8.x build correctly with Java 7, see >>> https://issues.apache.org/ooo/**show_bug.cgi?id=121754<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121754> >>> >>> All code was stored in cws hsqldb19: >>>> http://hg.services.openoffice.**org/hg/cws/hsqldb19/<http://hg.services.openoffice.org/hg/cws/hsqldb19/> >>>> The code transfer to ASF is not clear to me. >>>> >>> >>> If it can be useful to the project we can investigate it. I think that >>> legal issues are among the few confidential topics better discussed >>> off-list... but if anyone knows more, feel free to contact me directly so >>> that we can get it done. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Andrea. >>> >>> ------------------------------**------------------------------** >>> --------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >>> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >>> >>> >>> I started on the integration of 2.2.9 because the project took care of >> the handling different jdk and also the patches being applied were >> integrated into the codebase. Overall I saw it as a better move to have >> those issues taken care of and gain whatever advances that was made between >> 2.2.9 and 1.8.x. >> >> As fir the cws hsqldb19 branch, i did check through it and the patches >> from there are currently being used. Beside that I didn't see any relevant >> changes, for example the check for 1.8.x in the configure script. I ran >> into that while working on another issue. > > > yes...I asked about this yesterday on one of the issues -- there is a > lovely patch! -- not yet submitted. Somewhat under discussion in: > > https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=121837 > > Anyone wanting to deal with any hslqdb 2.2.9 will run into this problem. > > One thing I am looking into at the moment is recovery in Base, that are >> code that is checking for the version of hsql but I have not been able to >> locate it. >> >> Any pointers or knowledge of the Base code would be most helpful since >> just poking around is quite time consuming. I am learning quite a bit about >> the code so it is not all bad. >> >> Michael >> >> >> ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: >> dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >> >> > > > -- > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- > MzK > > "Achieving happiness requires the right combination of Zen and Zin." > -- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MzK "Achieving happiness requires the right combination of Zen and Zin."
