On Apr 1, 2013, at 3:54 AM, "Marcus (OOo)" <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 04/01/2013 03:20 AM, schrieb Rob Weir: >> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: >>> Many months ago we agreed to create a new file structure for the mirrors to >>> get rid of some historical grown limitations and complexity. >>> >>> I want to continue this and come to a final result. >>> >>> Current situation: >>> >>> - Mostly it's about to differenciate the files between "stable" for en-US >>> files only and "localized" for all other languages. >>> >>> - Due to Apache policy the source files must not be distributed by mirrors, >>> but have to be offered from Apache servers only. >> >> Is that actually true? I thought it was fine to distribute our source >> tarballs via the Apache mirror network. The things that must be >> distributed from the Apache dist server are the hash files and >> detached signature files. > > You are right, I've checked this with the current downloads. So, it can stay > as it is now. > >>> New naming structure: >>> >>> - A new structure could look like the following: >>> >>> <path_on_the_mirror>/<release_version>/<file_type>/<language_code>/<install_file> >>> >>> Some examples to make it more realistic: >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ >>> 4.0.0/binaries/en-US/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ >>> 4.0.0/binaries/it/Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_it.exe >>> >>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/ >>> 4.0.0/binaries/SDK/Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe >> >> This does not match your pattern. There is no<language-code> >> component to the path? > > It is, have a look for the "en-US" "it", and "SDK" pattern. > Maybe a typo in you example? I see "SDK" (and "binaries") but no language. Surely pretending that "SDK" is a language would only complicate the logic. >>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/ooo/ >>> 4.0.0/source/aoo-4.0.0-src.tar.bz2 >>> >>> What do you think? >> >> This is fine. Could even do without the<file_type> directory. If >> you do then directly to the<language_code> directory, everything is >> clear by the file name. > > Sure, but someone (or more people) wanted to have another sub-dir. But I > don't remember who it was. > > > Otherwise we end up with many directories >> with only a very small number of files in them. > > I don't think so. When you look at the following I wouldn't call it a small > number of files: > > http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/ar/3.4.1/ > > However, I don't care. Of course we could elleminate "<file_type>" from the > pattern when we could come to an agreeement. > > Marcus > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
