Am Montag, 11. März 2013 um 18:14 schrieb janI:
> On 11 March 2013 16:56, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote:
>  
> > Hi,
> >  
> > as part of our ip cleanup we remove the cppunit sources and allow the
> > system cppunit only. This is sup-optimal and a limitation from my point
> > of view.
> >  
> > I looked for an alternative and found GoogleTest [1] which seems to be a
> > possible alternative. I don't have time to investigate deeper in this at
> > the moment but maybe there is a new volunteer who is interested to
> > investigate some time here. I think it's a perfect task to get started
> > and play around with some basic modules like cppu etc.
> >  
>  
> The project I worked with (at work) last year used GoogleTest, combined
> with Python scripts and we had a little more than 10.000 unit test cases,
> which was tested at the end of every build run, so it works. We had however
> a pure C++ environment (apart from some php and js) so that may be a
> difference to AOO.
>  
> I can really recommend it, and it a good oportunity for a new volunteer. If
> nobody takes then I will grap it after I have finished l10n.
>  
>  

thanks for sharing your experience with googletest. Good to know that it can do 
what I expected or better that does scale with a large amount of test cases.

An improved unit testing should be a combined effort of all developers and I 
would say a prerequisite in the "future" for all new stuff. But ok we have to 
do some work before ;-)
>  
> rgds
> jan I.
>  
> >  
> > Juergen
> >  
> > [1] http://code.google.com/p/googletest/
> >  
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >  
>  
>  
>  


Reply via email to