On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 4:21 PM, janI <[email protected]> wrote: > On 8 March 2013 22:16, Rob Weir <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On Fri, Mar 8, 2013 at 3:51 PM, Dave Fisher <[email protected]> wrote: >> > Only if we are going to become a Review Then Commit project. >> > >> >> I was thinking more of whether it would be useful for working with >> patch contributions from contributors. >> > > Just be careful not to set level too high for volunteers, in my opinion the > mailing list is more than enough, no need for extra layers to complicate > matters. >
That's exactly the issue. The mailing list is so busy that new volunteers get lost, and their patches as well. And if they toss their patches to bugzilla, the patches can easily be lost there was well. So the question is whether a dedicated place for patches, with no distracting complications, would be preferred. -Rob > rgds > Jan I. > >> >> -Rob >> >> >> > Otherwise I think it becomes yet another system to learn how to use. >> > >> > On Mar 8, 2013, at 9:10 AM, Rob Weir wrote: >> > >> >> https://reviews.apache.org >> >> >> >> I didn't know that this existed at Apache. Should we be using it? >> >> >> >> -Rob >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> > >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
