On Wednesday, March 6, 2013, Rob Weir wrote: > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 4:48 PM, Donald Harbison > <dpharbi...@gmail.com<javascript:;>> > wrote: > > Well, if you read the latest MS-Office review in today's NYT[1] you'll > see > > the focus mostly on the new pricing. Then at the summary the author > brings > > up the fact that you don't need to buy it, just grab OpenOffice. > > > > Great mention! Onward to 100M.... > > > > "Office is still enormous, complex and sprawling. It’s still about 47,000 > > times more software than anybody really needs. And you can still manage > > perfectly well without it; Google and > > OpenOffice.org<http://openoffice.org/> still > > offer free equivalents of Word, Excel and PowerPoint. They’re not > anywhere > > near as refined or feature-packed as Office 2013, but they get the job > > done, and they make collaboration easy." > > > > Can you reach out and correct him on the name? The NYT should want to > get these things right.
Yes, I plan to. Who knows maybe he wants to do a follow up. > > -Rob > > > [1] > > > http://www.nytimes.com/2013/03/07/technology/personaltech/pogue-microsoft-office-365.html?pagewanted=2&_r=0&hp > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org<javascript:;> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org<javascript:;> > >
