On Mon, Feb 11, 2013 at 6:46 PM, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote:
> My impression was that even if we made no changes, from the user's
> perspective, they would lose all extensions.  This is due to the
> change in base directory for the profile.  So all extensions would be
> lost and need to be reinstalled.  So there will be no doubt in the
> user's mind, even if they do not read the release notes, that the
> extensions are gone.

Just copy the Firefox way.... A dialog reading something like "Oh,
we´ve detected some extesions, checking for compatibility with 4.0..."
followed by "the following extensions are not compatible with 4.0 and
have been disabled, you might want to check [url] for newer versions
compatible with 4.0".

Of course, automated checking of each extension on a central database
(like FF does) would be great, but the half-solution (informative
message) above is better than nothing.
Just my $0.02
FC

-- 
During times of Universal Deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act
Durante épocas de Engaño Universal, decir la verdad se convierte en un
Acto Revolucionario
- George Orwell

Reply via email to