----- Messaggio originale ----- > Da: Dave Fisher ... >> >> I agree that there should be no delay from the moment a veto is > acknowledged to the moment the commit is reverted, and that discussions can > be > held after the revert. But, whenever possible, give the committer the > opportunity to revert the commit himself. > > As long as "no delay" allows for the person being some reasonable > number of hours away from the their technology including that daily activity > that some call sleep. > Or work, we are all volunteers and can't necessarily spend time in the week to follow the list right? I would think "no delay" == within 24 hours. Pedro.
- Proposal: How we should handle committer vetos and reverts... Rob Weir
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle committer vetos an... Andrea Pescetti
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle committer veto... Dave Fisher
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle committer ... Rob Weir
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle committer ... Pedro Giffuni
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle commit... Joe Schaefer
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle c... Rob Weir
- Re: Proposal: How we should hand... Andrea Pescetti
- Re: Proposal: How we should ... Rob Weir
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle committer veto... Rob Weir
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle committer vetos an... Pedro Giffuni
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle committer veto... Rob Weir
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle committer ... Pedro Giffuni
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle commit... Rob Weir
- Re: Proposal: How we should handle commit... Herbert Dürr