Is this a regression compared to OOo 3.3? If so we need a bug report, preferably with a sample doc showing the issue.
Also remember 1-2-3 used 3 or 4 different formats in various versions of the product, so well need specifics, wk1, wk3, wk4, .123, etc. Presumably they are not all broken. -Rob On Jan 26, 2013, at 2:37 PM, Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie> wrote: > There is a thread on the en-Forum about opening (or not opening well) Lotus > 1-2-3 files in OpenOffice > http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=9&t=58580 > > The poster references the wiki page listing readable file formats > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice#File_formats > and suggests that the clain to read Lotus 1-2-3 files be removed. > > Any thoughts on this? > > -- > Rory O'Farrell <ofarr...@iol.ie>
