+1, the idea of making the structure is something I would like to see. Would love to help but I am hung up on translate-vm and a couple of other things.
Jan I. On 23 January 2013 09:31, Jürgen Schmidt <jogischm...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > we currently still have a complex but not necessary 3 layer directory > structure in the office that makes many things more complicate and is > completely unnecessary. > > The reason why we have this is historical and not longer relevant and > the question is if we want to get rid of this for our next release? > > Our office installation directory structure becomes cleaner and more > straight forward and we can eliminate some potential conflicts with > another derivative product that still hijacked some of our installation > bits (names). > > This task seems to be easy on the first look but is more complicate and > more work on the second. > > 1. files and directories (URE, base layer) have to be installed in new > places, we haver to think about the structure. > 2. we have to check library link flags which are currently different for > libraries from the different layers. > 3. we have to check and consolidate many configuration files where we > have entries to find the related files/entries in the different layers. > 4. we have to check some bootstrap processes and have to check that they > work correct > 5. we have to do very careful testing, testing, testing ... > 6. ... > > Any opinions or volunteers who have interest to help with such a > project? If we decide to work on it, we have to start immediately to > have enough time for testing. > > Juergen > > >
