Rob Weir wrote: >Take a look at the lovely new page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/OpenOffice >Some choice bits of distortion:
Thanks for publicising this. I really did mean I wanted more eyes on it. Useful pages in dealing with contentious topics (which is everything): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Identifying_reliable_sources Cheers, looking forward to help. The talk page welcomes you! Anyone with a good clippings file for the history of OO from 2000? Such a history, that gets across *why* OO is as historically important as it is, is not yet written, as far as I know. I went through the OO clippings pages and archive.org but didn't find a lot. - d.
