On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 4:18 PM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: > Hmm... could be used for spamming. > > Maybe it's policy after all. >
There are some saved queries and reports that are quite expensive, computationally. Cross-tabulations, etc., and they take several seconds for me to run them. So perhaps they want to avoid a DoS attack based on a trivial wget of an expensive query URL? -Rob > cheers, > > Pedro. > > >>________________________________ >> Da: janI <j...@apache.org> >>A: dev@openoffice.apache.org; Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> >>Inviato: Lunedì 14 Gennaio 2013 16:10 >>Oggetto: Re: Bug list in release notes: why bugzilla account needed? >> >> >>Easy solution. >> >>make an account "anonymous" with a easy password, and publish that...nearly >>as good as not needing to login. >> >>rgds >>Jan I. >> >> >>On 14 January 2013 21:57, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: >> >> >>> >>>Hi Hagar; >>> >>>It's not a policy, it's simply the way bugzilla works. >>> >>>A developer (hi hdu@ :) recently wrote a nice script that crosschecks >>>bugzilla >>>issues with commits so the situation will improve greatly in the near future. >>> >>>Pedro. >>> >>> >>> >>>>________________________________ >>>> Da: Hagar Delest <hagar.del...@laposte.net> >>>>A: dev@openoffice.apache.org >>>>Inviato: Lunedì 14 Gennaio 2013 15:42 >>>>Oggetto: Bug list in release notes: why bugzilla account needed? >>> >>>> >>>>Here is a message on the forum about the necessity to have a login to view >>>>the list of the bug fixes: >>>>http://forum.openoffice.org/en/forum/viewtopic.php?f=50&t=58749 >>>> >>>>Indeed, why is it mandatory to have an account to view the bug list? >>>>This is not user-friendly. >>>> >>>>Can the policy be changed? >>>> >>>>Hagar >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >>
