+1 to the comments from andrea, seen from that point wiki is really better
than a semi-static MDTEXT,. I only have one worry, how do we keep the local
sites in sync ?

If we use wiki, we need to find a way where it is easy just to translate
the changes and more importantly be aware of a necessity for translation,
"watch" is to me NOT the right choice.


Jan I.


On 3 December 2012 22:49, Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote:

> Am 12/03/2012 09:19 PM, schrieb Rob Weir:
>
>  On Mon, Dec 3, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Keith N. McKenna
>> <keith.mcke...@comcast.net>  wrote:
>>
>>> Rob Weir wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Sun, Dec 2, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Andrea Pescetti<pesce...@apache.org>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 26/11/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> [Can I install Openoffice on my IPAD?] I nominate this for an FAQ.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree. But where is our FAQ page currently? Unfortunately, there's an
>>>>> "OpenOffice FAQ" easily reachable by search engines at
>>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/faq.**html<http://www.openoffice.org/faq.html>and
>>>>>  quite outdated (I don't know
>>>>> whether
>>>>> it's reachable from the home page, but it doesn't seem so).
>>>>>
>>>>> Time to make a new FAQ available or update the old one and link to it
>>>>> from
>>>>> the current site?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> The current location of the FAQ is prominent in search results.  That
>>>> is valuable and worth preserving.
>>>>
>>>> But the current FAQ contents are out of date.  They would need a lot
>>>> of work to update/correct them.
>>>>
>>>> Although the FAQ's are presented in a way that is OK for the user, the
>>>> static HTML source is structured in a way that will be painful to
>>>> maintain.   Getting a cleaner structure, for example using HTML
>>>> definition lists (<dl>) would be easier and could be maintained via
>>>> the CMS web interface.
>>>>
>>>> There is another set of FAQ's on the documentation wiki:
>>>> http://wiki.openoffice.org/**wiki/Documentation/FAQ<http://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/FAQ>
>>>>
>>>> These also appear to be unmaintained.  But I think the wiki version
>>>> would be easier to maintain.
>>>>
>>>> So one possible resolution could be:
>>>>
>>>> 1) Take anything of use from the FAQ's at
>>>> http://www.openoffice.org/faq.**html<http://www.openoffice.org/faq.html>and
>>>>  copy them into new FAQ items on
>>>> the wiki
>>>>
>>>> 2) Update the other FAQ's on the wiki
>>>>
>>>> 3) Add new items to the wiki FAQ (like the iPAD question)
>>>>
>>>> 4) Delete the old FAQ directory and replace with a single page that
>>>> directs the reader to the wiki FAQ's.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -Rob
>>>> -Rob
>>>>
>>>>  Regards,
>>>>>     Andrea.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Rob;
>>>
>>> I have been updating some of the FAQ's on the wiki site that were tagged
>>> as
>>> needing help. I am more than willing to start a comprehensive review and
>>> clean-up of the User FAQ's on the documentation wiki if that is the way
>>> we
>>> decide to go. The advantage is that the wiki is easier to maintain and
>>> it is
>>> already categorized with a toc on the main page.
>>>
>>>
>> The other FAQ on the website is also categorized:
>> http://www.openoffice.org/faq.**html <http://www.openoffice.org/faq.html>
>>
>> So whatever direction we start from we'll probably want to update and
>> consolidate.
>>
>> In my personal opinion, mdtext on the website is a good solution here.
>> But my opinion takes a back seat when someone else actually volunteers
>> to do the work.  So if you prefer the wiki for this, then you have a
>> +1 from me.  I'd just recommend that you fold in anything good from
>> the existing website into the wiki, so we have can have a single FAQ
>> for the project.
>>
>> Oh, actually we have a few other FAQs:
>>
>> http://openoffice.apache.org/**community-faqs.html<http://openoffice.apache.org/community-faqs.html>
>>
>> http://openoffice.apache.org/**developer-faqs.html<http://openoffice.apache.org/developer-faqs.html>
>>
>> http://openoffice.apache.org/**pmc-faqs.html<http://openoffice.apache.org/pmc-faqs.html>
>>
>> Maybe a simplifying assumption could be:
>>
>> 1) We make the MWiki FAQ's be the user-facing FAQs about the product
>> and the project
>>
>> 2) We have the "internal" project-facing FAQ's on
>> openoffice.apache.org website, in their current mdtext format.
>>
>
> I also would like to see FAQs in the Wiki, for both parts. FAQs have the
> attribute that they are never complete, need to be updated regularily and
> nearly anybody has something to add.
>
> So, it should be the best if indeed anybody can do the update. That's best
> done within the Wiki. Mistakes can be corrected fast and bad changes
> reverted easily.
>
> My 2 ct.
>
> Marcus
>

Reply via email to