You might be very right, the user that changed the rights is created back in 2007, and is by the way one of user destined for deletion.
Jan. On 29 November 2012 15:29, Rob Weir <robw...@apache.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 9:17 AM, janI <j...@apache.org> wrote: > > Yes I locked it hard down, on request from the community....I had to use > > the big knife to be fast. > > > > I am looking into how to open for sysop, but my concern is that at least > 2 > > spam accounts (Or more correctly 2 that fit the pattern) have got changed > > rights and I cannot see to what...so either a sysop have done it, or they > > have somehow aquired sysop priviledges. > > > > Third option: users with legacy sysop privileges had their accounts > hacked due to weak passwords or something. > > -Rob > > > I will look further into the settings in a couple of hours. > > > > Jan. > > > > On 29 November 2012 11:37, tj <t...@apache.org> wrote: > > > >> On 11/28/2012 16:48, janI wrote: > >> > >>> This is my final sql script for location old users without > contributions, > >>> can someone please verify the script ? > >>> > >>> The script only collect user_id, user_name, user_registration in the > table > >>> xmaint_uids. > >>> > >>> > >>> It is running right now, and once finished (in the morning if no > errors) I > >>> will publish the names that will be removed, wait 72 hours and then > remove > >>> them, unless objections. > >>> > >>> The delete statements that comes afterwards are quite simple: > >>> > >>> delete from user where user_id in (select user_id from xmaint_uids); > >>> delete from logging where log_user in (select user_id from > xmaint_uids); > >>> > >>> Jan. > >>> > >>> Jan, > >> > >> You have locked down the wiki so tightly that even sysops can't create > >> new pages. If this is necessary, we'll have to live with it, but please > let > >> us know for how long. If this is not necessary, please fix it. > >> > >> /tj/ > >> > >> > >> >
