On 11/20/12 1:16 AM, Andrew Rist wrote: > > On 11/19/2012 4:13 PM, Andrew Rist wrote: >> >> On 11/19/2012 3:28 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: >>> Re this discussion initiated by Marcus on Nov 9 (I know longer have >>> the original): >>> >>> http://markmail.org/message/fz7mkldympxwrnvn >>> >>> Whole looking around for our current buildbot output, I did find >>> successful builds for Linux and Win linked on this page: >>> >>> http://ci.apache.org/projects/openoffice/ >>> >>> No Mac however. >> We're waiting for access to the Mac buildbot. The buildbot software >> has only recently been loaded on the current box - the older Mac slave >> turned out to be 'all dead'. >> Our build is a bit of a hog, and requires a bunch of prerequisites, so >> we have to be careful about not breaking the other projects on the box. >> That said, we do want a Mac bot and it is an open issue. >>> At any rate, I just thought I might put this out there for >>> consideration for "development" versions. >>> >>> However, on the above page, languages other than "en" only provided >>> for Windows(?) >> huhhh? Pretty sure full language set is built on L32 and L64. > oh - en-US only. This is something to discuss - though not sure of the > value of all languages on all platforms nightly. Perhaps we do all > languages for all platforms for just the SNAPSHOT builds.
I agree en-US for the nightly builds is sufficient and all "released" + planned languages for the snapshots Juergen >> We are looking to down rev the Linux32 bot to Ubuntu 10.10 do that the >> install bits are linked against the right symbols, etc. >>> >>> And, part 2, should we be testing these? >> sounds great. Actually, this was discussed during ApacheCon, and it >> is another of our long standing goals. >> >
