Now go do like you said you would do. Or is your word not your bond? 2012/7/16 Pierre Smits <[email protected]>
> You didn't state any conditions for reverting it. > > > 2012/7/16 Adrian Crum <[email protected]> > >> For what reason? Is there a flaw in the design? >> >> -Adrian >> >> >> On 7/16/2012 12:16 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: >> >>> Then I object to having it in trunk before the outcome of this >>> discussion. >>> >>> 2012/7/16 Adrian Crum >>> <adrian.crum@sandglass-**software.com<[email protected]> >>> > >>> >>> We are still discussing it, and if there are any objections I can revert >>>> the commit. >>>> >>>> -Adrian >>>> >>>> >>>> On 7/16/2012 12:04 PM, Pierre Smits wrote: >>>> >>>> You make it sound like it is still open for debate. However, you >>>>> committed >>>>> this new feature to trunk. In barely under 30 hours after you started >>>>> this >>>>> mail thread. If you were truly seeking input from the community, you >>>>> could >>>>> and should have waited longer and for the outcome. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >> >> >
