I will give it a try, but it will have to wait until tomorrow.
-Adrian
On 4/30/2012 12:42 PM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
If, as Adam mentioned, it is an issue caused by the time-slice in your box,
then setting a greater timeout may fix the issue... if you will be able to make
it work with, let's say 600 ms (or even 1s) then I would like to commit the
change to make the test a bit more robust (even if it will be slower).
Jacopo
On Apr 30, 2012, at 12:17 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
On 4/30/2012 10:27 AM, Jacopo Cappellato wrote:
On Apr 23, 2012, at 3:47 PM, Adrian Crum wrote:
I tried experimenting with the sleep timing and I also replaced the
Thread.sleep call with a safer version, but the tests still failed.
interesting... but if you change the Thread.sleep timeout from 200 to 2000 it
works, right?
I changed it to 300. By the way, the test finally passed for the first time
when I had another non-OFBiz process running at the same time that was making
heavy use of the hard disk.
-Adrian
